From: Milton Aupperle <milton@outcastsoft.com>
Date: April 16, 2007 10:15:43 AM MDT
To: Astro_IIDC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Astro_IIDC] Does this advice apply
Hi Raye;
Yes it does work that way, except that our "slider" numbers indicate the radius of each Sharpening increment. Lapalcian Pyramidal Sharpness works in a a similar way too.
Depending on how much noise is in the image, I'll typically use 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 in decreasing order amounts.
TTYL..
Milton J. Aupperle
President
ASC - Aupperle Services and Contracting
Mac Software (Drivers, Components and Application) Specialist
#1005 - 815 14th Avenue. S.W.
Calgary Alberta T2R0N5
1-(403)-229-9456
www.outcastsoft.com
Proud Supporter of the "Party of Alberta"
http://www.partyofalberta.org/
On 16-Apr-07, at 5:25 AM, Ray Byrne wrote:
Hi Guys,
I'm still on the ToUcam Yahoo Group and one of the members posted the message below does the "wavelets" bit of Astro IIDC work in the same way?
Regixtax wavelets are not too complicated once you understand them.
They are basically similar to unsharp masking, but with one big
difference. The slider bars allow you to sharpen the image by
detail size. The #1 slider bar sharpens the finest details. The #2
slider sharpens details a bit bigger. And so on. The #6 slider bar
sharpens only the largest details.
Snipped for Brevity
ATB
Ray Byrne
in4media | graphic and website DESIGN
T: 01793 435704