From: "milton_aupperle" <milton@outcastsoft.com>

Date: August 29, 2009 3:01:33 PM MDT

To: Astro_IIDC@yahoogroups.com

Subject: Re: New file uploaded to Astro_IIDC - false colors


Hi Alberto;


Thanks for the clarification on what "Not True Color" means.


I don't think it really matters what you call it, and I am not even sure it's necessary to mention it. Had that phrase not been embedded the movie, I would never have asked about it :)


When I shoot LRGB images like my M52, I'm basically doing the same thing, I'm colorizing the Luma image with R, G, B frames.



TTYL..


Milton Aupperle



--- In Astro_IIDC@yahoogroups.com, albe albo <richter1956@...> wrote:


Thank you Alan and Milton.


True...the color are not ..true.

Since the focus of the animation was the eclipse  and not the planet/moons  themselves  I added the colors in post production only for presentation purposes.

The whole animation is BW (infrared) but i added a defocused color jupiter map over the planet applying the "color" ink (photoshop like).

The same way on the 2 moons i added "their" color in order to distinguish them.

I noticed that it is a normal procedure for the Sun.

Question: If this "artistic" manipulation could be misinterpreted should i explain it better or should i  skip it?

I liked the idea to add a touch of color to that grey world...

Sorry for the inconvenience but i thought that mentioning "color not true" was enough.

Should I write "colorized"?

Suggestions are well accepted.


Alberto