From: "doobisary" <tjp314@pacbell.net>
Date: July 15, 2010 10:24:52 AM MDT
To: Astro_IIDC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Impromptu ccd shootout
To add:
I came this close () to buying a 9.9 micron pixel Scorpion that was on ebay a while ago, but didn't because I *thought* I'd want more pixels for DSO imaging, and I have 3 Pt Grey cameras for planetary imaging now. But I've actually had such good results with processing my planetary videos by increasing the image size 2x during stacking that I think that would work well with that Scorpion as well, bringing the result up to 1280x960, which should make for a decent-looking image if the stars are all nice and tight.
Unfortunately, that camera isn't on ebay right now! (I suppose I could look into a new Flea2 with that chip in it, though that would be more expensive)
-Tim.
--- In Astro_IIDC@yahoogroups.com, Milton Aupperle <milton@...> wrote:
Tim;
On 15-Jul-10, at 9:13 AM, doobisary wrote:
Jim:
Was this one of the Scorpions with the 9.9 micron pixels?
I did some imaging with my 1600x1200 scorpion while in Utah last
week. Since my NJP mount was incapacitated for a couple days (I
broke the Celestron tripod I had it mounted on!), I did some
unguided imaging with my Meade 2045/LX3 and Meade .63x FR.
I found it hard to take exposure longer than about 20 seconds
without drift showing, so I kept it down.
I also found it hard to stretch the noise out so that it wasn't
objectionable, and I wasn't too satisfied with what was left of the
image when subtracting dark frames. So, I kept my images on
subjects like star clusters, where clipping off nebulosity wasn't a
problem.
What gains level were you using (it's in the movie / frame capture
logs if you do not remember) . My guess is your cranked the gain all
the way up, which is where the noise comes in, especially for uncooled
cameras.
Let me reiterate the mantra "Noise == Gain / Gain == Noise". Say that
over and over and over :)
As I have said before, the Scorpion 1600x1200 have small pixel (3.6?
microns if I recall right) sizes, so they are not really light
sensitive compared to larger pixel sizes. For example a 9.9 microns
Scorpion will be 7.56 TIMES more sensitive than the 3.6 micron
Scorpion is. So a 10 second exposure with 9.9 micron pixels is the
same as a ~76 second exposure for 3.6 micron pixels.
TTYL..
Milton J. Aupperle