From: "Tim" <tjp314@pacbell.net>
Date: April 25, 2005 1:53:47 PM MDT
To: Astro_IIDC@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: jupiter with moons/ 4-19-05
Milton:
Thanks for the reply.
I check the website for weather sometimes, but not always. Probably should, though.
After all, the computer's right there in front of me when I need to know!
Interesting about Astro IIDC. I am very anxious to try it out with a firewire camera. Should
be later this week, unless I lose the bid on this one. Then, I'll deal with the weather. ;o)
Already, though, the cababilities and advantages of Astro IIDC, so far as I can tell, far
outstrip any of the packages available for the PC.
My HP laptop, with a 1Ghz Celeron (or was that Celery?) processor and .5GB RAM still takes
several minutes to process a 2-min, 1200-frame avi with Registax 2. I tried Registax 3,
but it freezes before I get to the processing stage.
I think that computer has a 60GB hard drive, and I've found that it starts to lose frames if I
fill it up within about 5GB of capacity. So, I acquire a movie, process a "final" picture from
it, then delete or write over the movie with the next one to stay "efficient." I can get about
5 or 10 useable products in a session that way.
I've been finding it rather entertaining of late - the popularity of the ToUcam. When I
compare the ToUcam with the much older 3Com Homeconnect, I'm amazed at the
difference in quality of the individual frames. The ToUcam usually wins out in the end
because of the higher transfer rate, but the individual frames are always quite a bit worse
than the individual frames from the 3Com.
So, I'd been hoping for something for amateur astronomers to use with firewire webcams
(and Macs!) for a long time now. I've considered, recently, buying another 3Com (they're
readily available on ebay), since mine arrived with a crack in the case. But now, I don't
think I will. Even if the individual frame quality from the 3Com were comparable to a
firewire camera (doubtful), the best frame rate/low compression combination still only
gets me 2 or 3 frames in a second. An order of magnitude more? I can live with that!
-Tim.
--- In Astro_IIDC@yahoogroups.com, Milton Aupperle <milton@o...> wrote:
Hi Tim;
On 25-Apr-05, at 12:08 PM, Tim wrote:
but the seeing
was absolutely awful - and when I saw later on the news that the Jet
Stream was right over
Los Angeles, I saw why! We've got rain coming again later this week,
so it isn't likely that
the seeing will be good between now and next week. But I'll keep
trying.
I like to check
http://www.theweatherchannel.ca/weather/maps/floods.htm?sys
to see where the Jet Stream(s) and major systems are. Calgary has been
having a week of good to very good stable clear skies (last night I got
another 10 gigbytes of good jupiter movie), but that's supposed to end
in a few days.
Are you saying that Astro IIDC doesn't give you a box for registering
like Registax does,
for instance? That could be a problem, but maybe offset somewhat by
the greater ability
to select stacked frames? I particularly like the option of setting
the minimum quality for
inclusion in the video up front.
This refers to two separate aspects of stacking and aligning in Astro
IIDC for different versions.
Version 1.03.00 beta of Astro IIDC (only available to registered
customers) can stack and align in real time (ie at approximately 30 fps
on a G4 1.25 Gighz laptop) and produces a 16 bit single frame stack
tiff file. You can use the Sharpness percentage estimator to eliminate
"blurry" frames on the fly. You don't select an area to align with and
it does it automagically.
Version 2.00.00 beta of Astro IIDC (currently available to a few
select beta testers) can do the above (actually better now) and also
can do it with recorded 8 or 16 bit movies (note there is no other
stacking software on the Mac for 16 bit movies at all). It will
calculate image sharpness for all the frames, then lets you set a % cut
off based on the statistics of the sharpness, using a histograms and
mean, median, mode and STD to decide which to include/exclude, and then
auto aligns the frame using a user selected algorithm (planetary or
Lunar/Solar). It also can batch stack movies so in most cases I set a
few parameters up in a dilaog, pass it a list of up to 255 movies and
off it goes. Also every image I've posted here (including the DSO star
shots) has been aligned and stacked using Astro IIDC 2.0. Nebula and
star shots are still problematic and not 100% reliable - but eventually
I'll design a TIN or Chord star recognition system for that case.
Hope that helps..
Milton J. Aupperle
President
ASC - Aupperle Services and Contracting
Mac Software (Drivers, Components and Application) Specialist
#1005 - 815 14th Avenue. S.W.
Calgary Alberta Canada T2R0N5
1-(403)-229-9456
milton@o...
www.outcastsoft.com